Blog  /  Plasma Donation Company Lawsuit

Plasma Donation Company Lawsuit

EEOC Files Disability Discrimination Lawsuit Against Talecris Plasma and Grifols Over Revoked Job Offer

TS
TAP Series Editorial 3 min read
EEOC Files Disability Discrimination Lawsuit Against Talecris Plasma and Grifols Over Revoked Job Offer

Background

Talecris Plasma Resources, part of the Grifols family of plasma donation companies, is facing a federal lawsuit for alleged disability discrimination. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) accused the company of unlawfully rescinding a job offer to a nurse applicant after she requested a reasonable accommodation related to her recovery from substance use disorder.

The case stems from events in 2022 at Talecris’s Pueblo, Colorado plasma donation center, where the applicant was initially offered a nursing position but was later denied employment following disclosure of her disability.

Incident Details

According to the lawsuit, the nurse applied for a position at Talecris in March 2022 and received a job offer in April. After accepting the offer, she informed the company of her completed rehabilitation for alcohol and substance use disorder and ongoing participation in a professional treatment program through Colorado’s Peer Assistance Services, Inc.

The program required periodic reporting, taking only about 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Despite this minimal accommodation request, Talecris allegedly refused to make the adjustment. The company cited internal policies against hiring nurses with license restrictions or those participating in treatment programs, even though the applicant’s restrictions did not interfere with her ability to perform job duties. Talecris then revoked her offer of employment.

Legal Background

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employers from discriminating against qualified individuals based on disability. It also requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations unless doing so would cause undue hardship. This includes individuals recovering from substance use disorders who are no longer engaged in illegal drug use and have successfully completed rehabilitation.

The EEOC filed the case — EEOC v. Talecris Plasma Resources, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-03066 — in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado after efforts to reach a settlement during the agency’s conciliation process failed.

Relief Sought

The EEOC seeks back pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages for the affected applicant, along with injunctive relief to prevent future violations. The relief would require Talecris and its parent company, Grifols, to review and revise hiring policies that may exclude qualified individuals based on disability-related accommodations.

Key Takeaways

  • Substance use recovery is protected under the ADA. Applicants who have completed rehabilitation programs cannot be denied opportunities solely based on their past condition.
  • Employers must consider reasonable accommodations. Even minor accommodations, such as allowing time for program-related reporting, fall under ADA protections.
  • Policy reviews are crucial. Organizations should ensure internal policies align with federal laws to prevent unintentional discrimination against qualified individuals.

Conclusion

This lawsuit underscores the EEOC’s ongoing efforts to ensure that individuals recovering from substance use disorders are not unfairly excluded from employment opportunities. Employers are reminded of their duty to engage in the interactive process when accommodation requests arise — not to dismiss or penalize applicants for seeking fairness under the law. 

TS
Written by TAP Series Editorial · Reviewed October 8, 2025

Our editorial team researches and fact-checks every article against current workplace, safety, and compliance guidance. This content is for general information and is not legal advice.